Layer 1
Public front door
Social traffic should land on baseline, Field Notes, tracker, or safe resources — not directly on research-vendor cards.
Research Vendor Disclosures
Protocol V uses affiliate relationships to fund the work. This page explains research partners, why they are listed, and the boundaries around them. The rule is simple: education earns trust, resources stay disclosed, and science reels do not become shopping carts.
Layer 1
Social traffic should land on baseline, Field Notes, tracker, or safe resources — not directly on research-vendor cards.
Layer 2
Compound and pathway pages explain mechanisms, evidence gaps, and boundaries without turning into vendor funnels.
Layer 3
This page is where revenue disclosure, partner notes, and affiliate codes live — deeper than the front door and separated from public science reels.
Evaluation framework
Does the partner fit a real Protocol V research, training, recovery, or documentation lane?
Is the affiliate relationship obvious instead of buried?
Is the page clear that links are not medical instructions?
Is the vendor path separated from Yellow/Red-adjacent science reels?
Research-resource partners
Broad research catalog • RP&D documentation lane
Listed because the catalog overlaps with Protocol V research-library topics and long-form RP&D documentation.
Research-resource disclosure • peptide documentation lane
Listed as a Protocol V research-resource partner for deeper documentation and resource transparency.
Research-resource disclosure • compound documentation lane
Listed as part of the deeper research-resource disclosure layer for Protocol V readers who want transparent partner information.
Hair research documentation • topical research lane
Listed because Protocol V hair-system content references hair/scalp research categories and requires transparent resource disclosure.
Longevity research-resource disclosure
Listed for Protocol V longevity and RP&D resource transparency, separated from public science reels and baseline content.